Posted by Andy [65.123.82.98 - ] on 12 July 2002 at 02.40.19 ZuluTime:

In Reply to: Meanings posted by Baron Greenback on 12 July 2002 at 01.13.47 ZuluTime:

I was planning on postponing my response to this comment until I could research the omniscience of God...a topic I have not mentioned until now on this board.

However, one common theme is that you won't believe in something until you see it. Not that you believe in it's inexistence (which seperates you from the people back in 1492 with the earths platformic shape). What I would like to know, though, is what if you're wrong? This is a lousy excuse to believe in a God...but honestly, there is a serious dogma in this community. No one has down right refuted that the existence of a deistic being is possible. And yet, no one has crossed the border to assume that it is possible in the realm of this discussion. Perhaps this is all due to a jading from past discussions with stoopid individuals. Perhaps not. Maybe I should start getting more than 3 hours of sleep a night. I have crossed the border in this sub-thread to allow for the possibility of no god. Is anyone willing to cross to the opposite side?